“Remits corrupt official pardoned crime” and compromise (figure)

　　The official property reported that the public announcement system appealed 20 years have not had the breakthrough slowly, have no alternative but saying that are the heavy awkwardness of Chinese Society. “Nanfang zhoumo” reported that to eradicate the psychological contradictions of some officials avoids the social agitation, has some scholars to propose that carries on to remit to the official existing problem of corruption, to receive in exchange appearing of official property declaration public announcement system. A jurist even believes that “the Chinese people must sacrifice one time, forgives one chapter”. This suggestion has caused the huge dispute in the reader and net friend.

　　With many readers and net friend are the same, the author also incomparably hates to corrupt official’s corrupt practices, but I am actually right “remits corrupt official pardoned crime” the suggestion to lift both hands approval. Some scholars believe that remits corrupt official pardoned crime to be possible to trade the official community to the support of official property declaration public announcement system. The opponents oppositionally interrogated: Does the public property which is plundered by the corrupt official such consider as finished? You ask that worker farmer can comply?

　　Argued that the bilateral most essential difference lies, the populace and corrupt official are at can the official community achieve a compromise – populace forgive corrupt official’s corruption, agreed that remits their pardoned crimes; The officials agreed that “sacrifice” own property right of privacy, under legal request truthfully public property (some corrupt officials must deliver corrupt spoiled obtained ill-gotten money before this truthfully, and guaranteed that from now on will take part in government certainly honestly, will otherwise receive unprecedented severe penalty). If the populace and officials are willing to compromise, “remits corrupt official pardoned crime” to receive in exchange for appearing of official property declaration public announcement system, has the reality feasibility. Otherwise, so long as has a side not to be willing to compromise, this suggestion forever difficultly will put into practice.

　　Reported the popular feelings which the network opinion reflected to look from the media, in the populace wanted the accommodationist as if not to be many, but according to the sample investigation of NPC deputy, 97% officials to the property reported that the public announcement system had the opposing opinion. Obviously, at least in the present, populace and official on “remits corrupt official pardoned crime” and official property reported that the public announcement achieves the compromise the possibility not to be big. Like this refuses to compromise, the official property reported that the public announcement system cannot establish slowly, simultaneously the corrupt government official because of lacking the effective containment of system is increasingly fierce, has possibility formation “corrupt more and more serious – corrupt official are getting more and more – the official property public announcement’s resistance is getting bigger and bigger – corrupt is getting more and more serious” the vicious circle, the consequence is really inconceivable.

　　Presents the present this kind everyone unable to convince who and no one is willing to make the least bit concessions the deadlock, lacks the compromise spirit to have the relations with the Chinese tradition’s political culture greatly. Thunder Yihe Ma Licheng talked about in a scientific dialog, in Chinese history reformed repeatedly belongs to the defeat, the including common lesson, was all quarters which the reform involved lacks the compromise spirit, “lost the benefit a side to be uncompromising, obtains a benefit side to be also uncompromising, did not yield”, caused to miss the reform good opportunity repeatedly, the social contradiction intensifies unceasingly, had the period turmoil finally and even changes from one dynasty to another. This kind of analysis is very have a head on shoulder.

　　Although Chinese traditional politics culture also stressed that “and for expensive” and “not does unto other, does not do to others” and “extremely wisely, but said doctrine of the mean”, what but the people felt and practice to be more was “struggle philosophy”. But in the modern politics and in the sociological field of vision, the compromise is the conflict resolution, realizes the harmonious one kind of adjustment mechanism, is the modern society political life essential one public rationality. Buchanan has said that “a political system may not satisfy all people’s desires, facing the inevitable conflict, humanity has two kinds of choices, or violence, either compromise.”British politics thinker Lord Acton has said that “compromise is the political soul, if not it completely.”Politics intrinsic needs to compromise, reform also intrinsic needs the compromise spirit.

　　Initiates the compromise spirit in the social politics reform, must first be explicit, the reform will not be “smashes an old world” and “in one night to trade the type revolution another day”, but must in the rational treatment historic tradition and in the realistic order foundation, gradually the change these hindrance social developments unreasonable factors. Reforms must touch some people’s benefits inevitably, some benefits are reasonable, but needs to make the concessions for the reform, some, although unreasonable, but sometimes it forms has the complex objective cause and historical reason – for instance official bribery and corruption, although with his qualities related, big and lacks the system environment which the supervision restricts to concern with since long the official authority. Regarding is reformed the benefit which touches, is not suitable issues an order eliminates unconditionally, but should carry on the compensation by the suitable way to the interest player or “buying off”. Does this to reduce the reform resistance, the receiving in exchange interest player to the reform the support. Thus, is reformed touches benefit the community, already has to lose and to have obtained, down to can avoid or “a side eating another side”, either “mutually wounded” “perishing together” the result, found the reform program, although does not satisfy completely actually on the whole can accept finally.

　　The author does not dare to hope that the populace and in the official short-term can on “remit corrupt official pardoned crime”, to release the official property to report the public announcement system achieves the compromise, but, if through to this public topic discussion and discrimination, the people can many strengthen some communications, the coordinated rationality, raises one kind of consultative and compromise energetic makings gradually, then was still a good fortune.

　　(Author is senior media public figure) (this article originates: Eastern morning paper)